Zoom RecordingNotes DocRecently, the ESIP Research Artifact Citation Cluster has been exploring concepts related to properly crediting research artifacts (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bsegmKQFxMSjFWBDisKihjxmVnSG3FfCivkpOEm1fmo/edit#gid=494444081) (e.g., data, software, samples, notebooks). What types of roles deserve credit? Who deserves to be listed as an author? We are able to provide some basic guidelines for thinking about credit for various data types, but, for the most part, credit is very situational to a project. In this session, we will provide an overview of what we discovered so far as well as think about next steps for the Cluster. Specifically, we want to explore ‘how’ credit is or is not assigned for data products. We are looking for use cases that demonstrate how current credit mechanisms have been leveraged to assign credit where credit is due and where current mechanisms fall short. How can authorities, such as promotion, hiring, or funding committees, be encouraged to recognize contributions to data products?
Recommended Ways to Prepare:- Think about the following question: What types of resources, information, or policies would help you provide or receive better credit for your research artifacts?
- Read Credit Where Credit is Due, published by this cluster in May 2022.
